May be the Puff Bar Aimed at Reducing the Addiction Potential of Electronic Cigarettes?

Puff Bar is a fantastic alternative to a traditional ice cream treat since it has none of the cons associated with an ice cream treat. Puff Bar is really a simple sweet treat, which makes it a great alternative to traditional ice cream treats. Puff Bar is made with only natural flavors, so it’s a healthy alternative for those who are watching their diet. In addition to that, Puff Bar is easy to make, you can make it as often as you want without needing to prepare the ice cream each and every time. It’s ideal for kids and for parties because it’s easy to serve.

Puff Bar is really a relatively new product, which was developed to test people reaction to herbal cigarette alternatives. When we smoke we are exposing ourselves to thousands of chemicals, some are good, some are bad. Puff Bar does not contain any artificial flavors, colors or nicotine and also has zero calories. The manufacturers declare that Puff Bar doesn’t really taste like cigarettes because it is made from completely 100 % natural ingredients including fruits, sugar and mint.

One of the primary issues in public areas health today is obesity and diet. Due to this many companies are developing products that help people stay trim. The Puff Bar is one of these products, they’re currently marketing them under names like Puff Nosh, Pop Tart and Popcorn Squeeze. The makers of Puff Bar claim that individuals who use their product to lose excess weight can easily do so when they only need to carry around the tiny product. The makers of Puff Bar are aware that since public health officials have been calling for more information on the dangers of empty e-cigarette cartridges it’s pretty clear that the general public wants to learn about Puff Bar and whether it poses a risk to public health.

By calling their product a “reusable” cartridge they’re in direct violation of the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA). According to the FDA any e-cigarette that contains nicotine must contain an insert Eightvape Coupon that allows one to put it into your mouth, therefore you can’t put it into your pocket or purse to go on it where ever you might go. If the product also has an extinguisher it is also in violation of regulations. The reason being that while there is no ash produced by a puff Bar e Cigarette it is not a valid device to use to refill an existing e cigarette with nicotine or to smoke a different one.

Since the maker of Puff Bar realized this their lawyers have sent letters to the firms that produce puff bars claiming that they have marketed their product in a way that is illegal. As well as sending cease and desist orders from the lawyers have demanded that the manufacturers cease and desist distribution of Puff Bar of Cigarettes and refund customers money. The letters request that they no longer make reference to their product as a “smoke machine”. Instead the business’s lawyers have suggested that they call it a “tobacco alternative”.

What the legal team did isn’t entirely surprising. The issue with Puff Bar is that its e Cigarette product is itself a loophole in the law. This is because there is currently no law mandating that electronic cigarettes need to include warning labels or advertising. The inclusion of a “smoking alternative” could open up a flood of lawsuits that would be filed by municipalities that wanted to charge cigarette companies for introducing another polluting form of tobacco into the marketplace.

Along with the possibility of a lawsuit being filed by municipalities the inclusion of flavored e cigarettes out there could result in a decrease in the sale of tobacco by non-smokers. Research shows that smokers who are presented with non-tobacco flavored e-cigs will replace those cigarettes with those that contain nicotine. By making tobacco less accessible to young people and to the younger generations, this could substantially reduce the amount of people who die from tobacco related illnesses. And yes it seems that the addition of the puff bar to a number of tobacco-flavored electric cigarettes could lead smokers to search out “real” cigarettes and not rely so heavily on an alternative that may not provide them with nicotine.

It appears that the UK government could have a point. There is currently no requirement of tobacco companies to include warning labels on the products nor is there a ban on flavoured tobacco or e-liquid. The thing that these products all have in common is that they can not cause cancer or other diseases. It looks a question of economics that is being overlooked. A solution just like the puff bar would seem just like a much better way to earn money for tobacco companies because they are essentially creating products that are more difficult to consume, which implies that fewer people will purchase them.